Google

www ISR
For ISR updates, send us your Email Address


Back to home page

ISR Issue 54, July–August 2007



REVIEWS

The need for a third Reconstruction

Eric Mann
Katrina’s Legacy: White Racism and Black Reconstruction in New Orleans and the Gulf Coast
Frontlines Press, 2006
212 pages $15

Review by ERIK WALLENBERG

In A scant 200 pages, author Eric Mann takes on 400 years of racism in America and attempts to set out a program for building a broad new civil rights movement. While the sweeping scope of Katrina’s Legacy can be a bit overwhelming and leaves a number of ideas and arguments undeveloped, it is an exciting read.

In Katrina’s Legacy, veteran civil rights activist Eric Mann argues that we should view racism in American history as passing through two periods of reconstruction and two of reaction. He then goes on to set down a program for how we can turn the disaster of Katrina into a new period of “reconstruction.”

The book starts with the progressive legacy of the period of Reconstruction after the Civil War and how it was won. A “united front coalition drafted a program to consolidate the victory over the rebellious and racist South, and passed some of the most progressive legislation and social policies in U.S. history,” Mann argues. He takes us through the reaction to Jim Crow laws, the “second reconstruction” of the civil rights movement, then subsequent reaction to the new Right.

Mann argues that Hurricane Katrina’s impact on New Orleans has exposed the need for a “third reconstruction”:

What kind of a country…can allow a city of almost 500,000 people to shrink by half before our very eyes, and do virtually nothing to even try to recreate it; to allow more than 250,000 Black people from the African Diaspora to become part of a New Orleans Diaspora and do virtually nothing to assert, let alone implement, an effective Right of Return?

Mann is strongest and clearest when he argues for the right of return for all New Orleanians, to return the city to a “Black majority city.” There can be no rebuilding, no justice, no New Orleans, without a right of return. The argument, of course, doesn’t end with demanding the right, but also the resources to make it possible to live once again in the “Big Easy.” He quotes Beverly Wright of the Deep South Center for Environmental Justice, saying,

We need to go beyond the “Right of Return” to the “effective Right of Return.” We need plane tickets, bus tickets, housing, and a job or at least government benefits waiting for us when we do return.

This is another strength of Katrina’s Legacy. It offers up the voices of groups fighting for justice, as scattered and small as they are, on the Gulf Coast. Mann cites the work of the Common Ground Collective and Mama D’s, groups doing reconstruction and providing community services.

The ability of these groups to attract volunteers has shown the widespread desire to do something to help the people of New Orleans to return and rebuild. The potential for a broad response, however, has not been funneled into the kind of organization or movement that could win the government funds and resources that a large-scale reconstruction would require. The weak state of movement organization is a legacy of the decades of post–civil rights reaction, and there’s no instantaneous way to regain what has been lost.

Unfortunately, Mann doesn’t always draw the lessons that are most crucial. After reading about the willful neglect of the Bush administration—including Condoleezza Rice’s infamous New York shopping spree and night on Broadway while thousands of New Orleanians found themselves knee-deep—you have to wonder how Mann could argue for a cross-class movement of all African Americans. To state that racism has “created the material basis for a multi-class Black United Front” can only sow serious political confusion in a country where Black class polarization has grown sharply since the civil rights era—and where multiracial workers’ unity is a real option.

In the end, Mann asks who will live in the new New Orleans and who will reap the benefits of the rebuilding process, “Will it be those who suffered the pain of the hurricane? Or will New Orleans be ‘whitewashed,’ the goal of many for years?”
The answer will lie in how effectively organization and leadership can be rebuilt at the grass roots. Katrina’s Legacy, even with its contradictions, is a useful contribution to a crucial debate—how to construct the new civil rights movement that is so desperately needed today.

Back to top